Factors Influencing Board Member Compensation

The decision to provide compensation to board members depends on several factors, such as the size and budget of the organization, the time commitment and responsibilities of board members, and the expertise and experience required to serve on the board.

Size and Budget of the Nonprofit

Smaller nonprofits with limited resources may not be able to offer compensation to their board members due to budget constraints. This lack of compensation may lead to difficulty in attracting and retaining high-quality board members, as they may not be able to afford the time and effort required without any form of compensation. On the other hand, larger organizations with more significant budgets may have more flexibility to provide compensation to attract and retain high-quality board members. This may include offering stipends, reimbursements for travel expenses, or other forms of compensation.

Time Commitment and Responsibilities

Board members may have different levels of responsibility and time commitment, depending on the organization's size, complexity, and mission. For instance, a board member of a small nonprofit may have a few hours of meetings per month, while a board member of a large foundation may have several days of meetings, travel, and committee work. The time commitment required of board members may impact the level of compensation offered by the organization, as those with more significant responsibilities and time commitments may require more compensation to justify their efforts.

Additionally, the time commitment may vary depending on the organization's stage of development. For example, a startup nonprofit may require more time and effort from its board members to help establish the organization, while a more established nonprofit may require less time commitment from its board members.

Expertise and Experience of Board Members

Board members with specialized skills and experience may bring unique value to the organization, such as legal, financial, marketing, or management expertise. Board members' compensation may reflect their expertise and be designed to attract and retain top talent. For example, a nonprofit that focuses on legal advocacy may prioritize board members with legal expertise and offer higher compensation to attract and retain top legal talent.

Furthermore, compensation may be used to incentivize board members to participate in training and development programs to enhance their skills and knowledge. This investment in board member development can lead to increased effectiveness and impact of the organization.

In conclusion, compensation for board members is a complex issue that depends on several factors. Nonprofits must carefully consider their budget, time commitments, and the expertise required of board members when making decisions about compensation. By offering fair compensation, nonprofits can attract and retain high-quality board members who can help drive the organization's mission forward.

Common Compensation Models for Nonprofit Board Members

Nonprofit organizations use various compensation models to compensate their board members, depending on their preferences and legal requirements. In this article, we will explore some of the most common compensation models used by nonprofit organizations.

Volunteer-Based Boards

Some nonprofits have all-volunteer boards that do not receive any compensation at all. These boards rely on the dedication and commitment of their volunteers to carry out the organization's mission. Volunteer-based boards are often found in smaller organizations that do not have the financial resources to compensate their board members.

While volunteer-based boards may not receive any monetary compensation, they often receive other benefits, such as the satisfaction of contributing to a worthy cause, networking opportunities, and the ability to develop new skills.

Stipends and Honorariums

Some nonprofits offer a flat fee or a per-meeting fee to their board members to compensate them for their time and effort. These stipends or honorariums may be taxable or non-taxable, depending on the circumstances. Stipends are often used by larger organizations that have the financial resources to compensate their board members.

While stipends and honorariums provide compensation for board members, they may also create conflicts of interest. Board members may be more likely to prioritize their own financial interests over the organization's mission. To avoid conflicts of interest, nonprofits should have clear policies and procedures in place for determining and disclosing board member compensation.

Expense Reimbursement

Most nonprofits reimburse their board members for their out-of-pocket expenses related to board meetings, such as travel, lodging, meals, and other expenses. These reimbursements must be documented and reasonable. Expense reimbursement is a common compensation model because it allows board members to participate in the organization's activities without incurring significant personal expenses.

While expense reimbursement is a common practice, it is important for nonprofits to have clear policies and procedures in place for determining and documenting reimbursements. Board members should be required to submit receipts and other documentation to support their expenses, and the organization should have clear guidelines for what expenses are reimbursable.

In-Kind Benefits

Some nonprofits provide in-kind benefits to their board members, such as discounted memberships, tickets to events, or other perks. These benefits must be disclosed and justified as reasonable and necessary to support the organization's mission. In-kind benefits can be a way to compensate board members without incurring significant financial costs.

While in-kind benefits can be a valuable tool for compensating board members, nonprofits should be careful to avoid conflicts of interest. Board members should not receive benefits that could be perceived as influencing their decision-making or prioritizing their personal interests over the organization's mission.

In conclusion, nonprofit organizations have several options for compensating their board members. The compensation model chosen will depend on the organization's financial resources, legal requirements, and other factors. Nonprofits should have clear policies and procedures in place for determining and disclosing board member compensation to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure transparency.

Pros and Cons of Paying Nonprofit Board Members

The decision to compensate nonprofit board members has advantages and disadvantages, depending on the organization's needs, goals, and values.

Advantages of Offering Compensation

Compensation can attract and retain high-quality board members, increase their commitment and engagement, and recognize their expertise and contributions. A well-compensated board can also help to establish a sense of professionalism and dedication to the organization's mission. Compensation can also reduce the financial burden on board members who may have to take time off from work or travel long distances to attend board meetings. This can be especially important for organizations that require a significant time commitment from their board members.

For example, a nonprofit that focuses on environmental conservation may require board members to travel to remote locations to assess the impact of their conservation efforts. Compensating board members for their time and travel expenses can help to ensure that the organization is able to attract and retain experienced and knowledgeable board members who are passionate about the cause.

Potential Drawbacks and Risks

Compensation can create conflicts of interest, undermine the nonprofit's credibility, and divert resources from its mission. It can also send the message that board members are motivated primarily by financial gain rather than the organization's mission.

For example, if a nonprofit's board members are compensated based on the organization's financial performance, they may be more likely to prioritize short-term financial gains over the long-term success of the organization. This can lead to decisions that are not in the best interest of the nonprofit or its stakeholders.

Additionally, compensation can create a perception of impropriety among donors and the public. If a nonprofit is seen as paying its board members excessively, it may be difficult to convince donors that their contributions are being used effectively and efficiently. This can lead to a decrease in donations and support for the organization.

Overall, the decision to compensate nonprofit board members should be carefully considered in light of the organization's goals and values. While compensation can offer benefits such as attracting and retaining high-quality board members, it can also create risks and challenges that must be addressed. Ultimately, the board should prioritize the nonprofit's mission and the needs of its stakeholders above all else.

Conclusion

Nonprofit board member compensation is a complex and nuanced issue that requires careful consideration and judgment. Each organization must evaluate its circumstances, legal obligations, and ethical standards to determine the appropriate compensation model for its board members. Ultimately, the goal is to align board members' interests and incentives with the organization's mission and values to create a sustainable and impactful nonprofit.

‍